Can
a Company Hold AGM Now for Past Years and Take Benefit of the CCFSS Scheme?
(09th March 2026)
Article No 1024
SHORT
SUMMARY
After the introduction of the MCA CCFSS Scheme, many
professionals have asked whether a Company that has not prepared financial
statements for previous years can hold the AGM now and file the pending AOC‑4 and MGT‑7 under the Scheme.
Yes, the Company can hold the AGM now and subsequently file
the pending forms to avail the benefit of the Scheme.
However, doing so will not cure the default under Section 96
of the Companies Act, 2013 which prescribes the time limit for holding AGM.
Since the AGM for earlier years was not held within the prescribed time, the
company would have already committed a default under Section 96 which is
punishable under Section 99.
The Scheme
only provides relief from additional filing fees (generally up to 90% waiver)
for delayed filings. It does not provide immunity from statutory violations
such as failure to hold AGM on time. Therefore, separate compounding of offence
and payment of penalty under Section 99 may be required.
1. BACKGROUND OF THE ISSUE
Many
Companies, particularly inactive or non‑operational Companies, have not prepared their Financial
Statements for several years and therefore could not hold their AGMs. With the
introduction of the CCFSS Scheme, such Companies now intend to prepare pending Financial
Statements, hold AGM for past years, and file pending forms such as AOC‑4 (all types) and MGT‑7/MGT‑7A.
2. REQUIREMENT OF HOLDING AGM – SECTION 96
Under Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 every Company
must hold an Annual General Meeting within six months from the end of the
financial year and the gap between two AGMs shall not exceed fifteen months. If
AGM is not held within this time, the Company is in default of Section 96.
3. PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO HOLD AGM –
SECTION 99
If a Company fails to hold AGM in accordance with Section
96, the Company and every officer in default may be liable to penalty which may
extend up to ₹1,00,000 and in case of continuing default an additional
penalty of ₹5,000 per day may be imposed.
4. WHETHER THE SCHEME GIVES IMMUNITY FROM
SECTION 96
The CCFSS Scheme primarily deals with delayed filing of
forms and provides relief in the form of reduction or waiver of additional
filing fees. However, the Scheme does not grant immunity from violations such
as failure to hold AGM. Therefore, default under Section 96 continues to exist
even if filings are completed under the Scheme.
5. PRACTICAL SCENARIO
For example, if a company has not prepared financial
statements for multiple financial years and no AGM was held, the company may
now prepare the accounts, hold AGM and file the pending AOC‑4 and MGT‑7 forms under the Scheme. While the
company may benefit from reduced additional fees, the default of Section 96
still remains.
6. COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCE
Since the default under Section 96 has already occurred, the
company may need to file an application for compounding offence and pay the fine
as may be determined by the competent authority.
7. BENEFIT AVAILABLE UNDER THE SCHEME
The company may still take benefit of the Scheme by filing
pending statutory forms such as AOC‑4
and MGT‑7/MGT‑7A with significant reduction of additional filing fees,
which may go up to 90%. This results in substantial financial relief where
filings are delayed by multiple years.
8. RECOMMENDED COMPLIANCE APPROACH
Step 1 – Finalize financial statements for pending years.
Step 2 – Convene Board Meeting to approve financial
statements and AGM notice.
Step 3 – Hold AGM even if delayed.
Step 4 – File AOC‑4
and MGT‑7/MGT‑7A under the Scheme.
Step 5 – Apply for compounding of offence for violation of
Section 96 read with Section 99.
CONCLUSION
Companies that have not prepared financial statements for
earlier years may hold AGM now and subsequently file statutory forms pending to
avail the benefits under the CCFSS Scheme. However, such action does not remove
the default under Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company and its
officers may still be liable for penalty under Section 99 and may be required
to seek compounding of the offence.
Author – CS Divesh Goyal, GOYAL DIVESH & ASSOCIATES Company
Secretary in Practice from Delhi and can be contacted at csdiveshgoyal@gmail.com).
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this document have been prepared based
on relevant provisions and as per the information existing at the time of the
preparation. Although care has been taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness,
and reliability of the information provided, I assume no responsibility,
therefore. Users of this information are expected to refer to the relevant
existing provisions of applicable Laws. The user of the information agrees that
the information is not professional advice and is subject to change without
notice. I assume no responsibility for the consequences of the use of such
information.
IN NO EVENT SHALL I SHALL BE
LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM,
ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE INFORMATION