EDITORIAL 842
Whether a person can have
More than one DIN
Section 155 & Rule 11 of Companies (Appointment and Qualification
of Directors) Rules,2014
(24th July 2023)
SHORT SUMMARY:
A Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique
8-digit alphanumeric number issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
in India to individuals who wish to become directors of companies. It is a
mandatory requirement for any person who wants to hold the position of a
director in an Indian company.
The Director Identification Number (DIN) was introduced
in India with the enactment of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2006. The
amendment received the President's assent on January 12, 2007, and it came into
effect from that date.
In this editorial, the author shall discuss a very
important question raised by the directors: Whether a person can hold more
than one DIN. If yes, then from which DIN will he accept appointments? If
not, then what are the consequences?
The powers of allocation and approval of surrender of DIN
vested with Regional Director Northern Region, Delhi.
A.
LEGAL PROVISION:
As per Section 153:
Every individual intending to be appointed as director of
a Company shall make an application for allotment of Director Identification
Number to the Central Government in such form and manner and along with such
fees as may be prescribed.
As per Section 155:
No individual, who has already been allotted a Director
Identification Number under section
154,
shall apply for, obtain or possess another Director Identification Number.
Rule 11 Surrender of DIN:
The Central Government or Regional Director (Northern
Region), Delhi or any officer authorized by the Regional Director may, upon
being satisfied on verification of particulars or documentary proof attached
with the application received along with fee as specified in Companies
(Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014] from any person, cancel or
deactivate the DIN.
B.
Question to be
Discuss:
ü
Whether a person can hold more than one DIN
and what are the consequences for the same?
C.
Discussion on the
Questions:
To understand the
answer to the above-mentioned questions, we have to understand the purpose of
the DIN. The DIN was implemented to enhance corporate governance, track and
monitor the activities of company directors, and prevent multiple directorships
by individuals without proper disclosure. It has been a crucial identification
number for directors in Indian companies since its launch in 2007.
As per this, if a
person holds more than one DIN, the purpose of launching a DIN shall be in
vain. As such, he can hide his directorship from the other Companies. As DIN is
the only source to check the directorship of the Company.
There is a specific
section i.e. 155 which talk about Prohibition to Obtain More than One Director
Identification Number. Obtaining of more than one DIN is punishable offence u/s
159 of the Act.
D.
Course of Action by
such person:
If a person has more
than one DIN. Then such a person should immediately apply for the surrender of
one DIN with the Regional Director, Delhi. The detailed process of surrendering
DIN has been covered in another article.
As per the provisions
of Rule 11, a person can surrender his or her DIN if the DIN is found to be
duplicated in respect of the same person, provided the data related to both
DINs is merged with the validly retained number.
CONCLUSION:
A person can’t have
more than one DIN. If a person applies for more than one DIN, then it shall be
considered non-compliance as per Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Punishment for Section 155 is mentioned under Section 159.
Penalty U/s 159:
As per Section 159,
If any individual or director of a company makes any default in complying with
any of the provisions of section 152, section 155 and section 156, such
individual or director of the company shall be liable to a penalty which may
extend to fifty thousand rupees and where the default is a continuing
one, with a further penalty which may extend to five hundred rupees for each
day after the first during which such default continues.
ADJUDICATION:
There is a order
passed by ROC Chennai in case of Shri Thiyagarajan Parthasarathy u/s 454 for
noncompliance of Section 155 and imposed penalty as follow:
Company/ Officers to whom Penalty imposed
|
Total Period of Default
|
Penalty for defaults (Rs.) as per section
159 of the company act 2013
|
Additional penalty for continuing default
|
Penalty Imposed (Rs.
|
On Shri. Thiyagarajan Parthasarathy
|
907 Days
|
Rs. 50,0000+
Rs. 500 each day for continuing default
|
500*907=4,53,500
|
5,03,500
|
|
|
|
Total
|
5,03,500
|
Author – CS Divesh Goyal,
GOYAL DIVESH & ASSOCIATES Company Secretary in Practice from Delhi and can
be contacted at csdiveshgoyal@gmail.com).
Disclaimer: The entire contents of
this document have been prepared based on relevant provisions and as per the
information existing at the time of the preparation. Although care has been
taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the information
provided, I assume no responsibility, therefore. Users of this information are
expected to refer to the relevant existing provisions of applicable Laws. The
user of the information agrees that the information is not professional advice
and is subject to change without notice. I assume no responsibility for the
consequences of the use of such information.
IN NO EVENT SHALL I SHALL BE
LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM,
ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE INFORMATION